Legal Opinion

Bertolami v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 5, 1980No. 79-270PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The plaintiff in this case questions the legitimacy of an automobile liability policy clause that allows the insurer to deduct medical payments from amounts paid under the policy’s uninsured motorist endorsement. We hold that the clause is void.

On December 22, 1970, an uninsured motorist struck and injured Janet Bertolami, minor daughter of Jeannette Bertolami, as she was crossing a street. At the time of the accident, the plaintiff had in force a Merchants Mutual Insurance Company automobile liability policy. The policy carried an uninsured motorist endorsement, which provided coverage of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hackman v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Vigneault v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Grimes v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Orthopedic Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Morin v. Berkshire Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Fickbohm v. St. Paul InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API