Legal Opinion

Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'n

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1990No. 20480PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a medical payments setoff or crediting provision contained in an automobile insurance policy is enforceable and prevents an insured from recovering twice for medical payments under separate provisions of the policy which independently provide medical payments recovery for personal injuries. We hold that it does and affirm the decision of the district court.

The Facts

Appellant Karen Ellison (Ellison) was insured under an automobile insurance policy from respondent California State Automobile Association (CSAA). The policy provided both medical…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. Page Engineering Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. HumphreyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Sawyer v. Sugarless Shops, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Maxwell v. Allstate Insurance CompaniesNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Phillips v. ParkerNevada Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by58 opinions

  1. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Sandy Valley Associates v. Sky Ranch Estates Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kaldi v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Canfora v. Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API