Legal Opinion

Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group Exchange

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1970No. 10052-PRPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Justice.

The appellants, Reggie and Helen Bacchus (appellants) suffered severe injuries in an automobile accident on April 7, 1967. At that time they were covered by an insurance policy issued by the appellee, Farmers Insurance Group Exchange (Farmers), -which policy 1 included Uninsured Motorist Coverage as required by § 20-259.01 A.R.S. in the minimum amounts of $10,000 per person and $20,000 per occurrence. The other motorist involved in the accident was uninsured and, for the purposes of this appeal, there is no question concerning his sole liability for the accident nor of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Transportation Insurance Company v. WadeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Webb v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API