Legal Opinion

Fickbohm v. St. Paul Insurance

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2003No. 22,344, 22,343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

{1} Plaintiffs Darlene Fickbohm and Jean Jarvis (referred to jointly as Plaintiffs or individually as Fickbohm and Jarvis) appeal from the district court’s order permitting St. Paul Insurance Company (St.Paul) to offset from Plaintiffs’ uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage (UM/UIM) arbitration awards the amount it paid to Plaintiffs under the medical payments (medpay) portion of their respective automobile insurance policies. Although Plaintiffs’ briefs are framed as raising ten and nine issues respectively, they in fact raise multiple arguments with regard to one…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zane v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ullman v. Safeway Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API