Legal Opinion
Grimes v. Concord General Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 13, 1980No. 79-360PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
This appeal involves a petition for declaratory judgment (RSA 491:22) by which the plaintiff, Jerry H. Grimes, seeks a judicial determination of the extent of his insurance coverage under a single Family Combination Automobile Policy issued to him by the defendant, Concord General Mutual Insurance Company. The Trial Court {King, J.), after denying a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, transferred three questions of law to this court pursuant to RSA 491:17. The questions are as follows:
“1. Whether the New Hampshire Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act permits the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kemp v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Pearthree v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Holloway v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Hanover Insurance v. GrondinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Storms v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Szumigala v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Town of Epping v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.