Legal Opinion
Hackman v. American Mutual Liability Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 30, 1970No. 5796PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
The Trial Court {Leahy, C. J.) transferred without ruling six questions involving interpretation of an uninsured motorist’s endorsement upon an agreed statement of facts.
Plaintiff Paul L. Hackman was injured on October 4, 1966 in an accident with an uninsured motorist. Hackman was an employee of 0. K. Tool Co. acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. had issued to 0. K. Tool Co. both a workmen’s compensation policy and an automobile liability policy with an uninsured motorist endorsement. The coverage afforded by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- Standard Accident Insurance Company v. GavinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CahoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Gillen v. United Services Automobile AssociationSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Travelers Insurance v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- WATERTOWN FIREFIGHTERS, L. 1347, IAFF v. WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.