Legal Opinion

Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Orthopedic Professional Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 6, 1984No. 83-232PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

In this appeal, the plaintiff, Merchants Mutual Insurance Group (Merchants), petitioned for declaratory judgment to determine its coverage obligation to the defendant Walter N. Garger under the uninsured motorist endorsements of three separate insurance policies with respect to injuries resulting from a nonphysical contact accident involving an unidentified vehicle. The Master (Mayland H. Morse, Jr,, Esq.) found that Garger is entitled only to the minimum of $20,000 coverage under the uninsured motorist provisions of each of two of the policies, but that, since *652Merchants is entitled to offset…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Horne v. Superior Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CahoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Smith v. American Employers' InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. BangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Adams v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. Berna-Mork v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Dwight v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API