Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Stanton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1931No. Docket No. 357PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Defendant appeals from an interlocutory decree in an action for divorce. The complaint alleged and the trial court found that the defendant had been guilty of extreme cruelty. Appellant attacks the findings upon this issue as not being sufficiently supported by the evidence. It is also contended that there was insufficient corroboration of respondent’s testimony relative to the acts and conduct of appellant which it was alleged constituted extreme cruelty.

Appellant’s chief contention is that the trial court committed error in admitting testimony as to the excessive use of intoxicating liquor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Coleman v. FarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Heinrich v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Scheibe v. ScheibeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Popescu v. PopescuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Holmes v. HolmesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  5. Hayes v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API