Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Farwell

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9852PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action on a promissory note in the principal sum of $5,000. The plaintiff was the payee and the defendant the maker. The defenses were fraud and failure of consideration. The court found in favor of the plaintiff on all issues raised by the pleadings. The record is presented in a bill of exceptions which contains the following stipulation: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys of the respective parties to the within entitled action, that the foregoing bill of exceptions contains only part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Owen v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. HosnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mullanix v. BasichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Charles H. Duell, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API