Hall v. Hall
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Peirson Hall has appealed from that part of an interlocutory decree which ordered him to pay alimony and the fees of Mrs. Hall’s attorneys. He also questions the validity of an order requiring him to pay the cost of printing her brief on the appeal and $200 as attorneys’ fees in connection therewith.
Pursuant to their stipulation, the decree divided the community property of the parties, compels Hall to pay $100 per month for the support of a minor child and to maintain in force certain insurance policies upon - his life. In addition, he is ordered to pay $350 per month for the support of Mrs.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Lincoln v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re Marriage of RosanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.