Legal Opinion
County of Colusa v. Strain
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1963No. Civ. 10452PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Plaintiff County of Colusa and defendant Strain filed an “agreed ease’’ under the provisions of section 1138, Code of Civil Procedure. According to the agreed facts, the county has adopted Ordinance Number 265, requiring a permit for the leveling of land having an area greater than 5 acres. Defendant Strain was aware of the ordinance but refused to comply with it. In July 1959 he conducted a leveling operation without a permit on land having an area greater than 5 acres. A criminal complaint was filed and he was tried upon a charge of violating the ordinance, but the jury failed to agree. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. AguiarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Coral Construction, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People ex rel. Becerra v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.