California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.
The County of Los Angeles and the county engineer appeal from a judgment declaring that the county “Water Ordinance,” ordinance No. 7834, cannot constitutionally apply to investor-owned public utilities and enjoining the county and the county engineer from enforcing-the ordinance against the public utilities.
Statement of the Case
The action was brought by the public utilities and the California Water Association, an organization to which each of the respondent public utilities belongs, 1 on behalf of the respondents and all other investor-owned public utilities serving water within the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.