Legal Opinion
Coral Construction, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 2004No. A101842PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RIVERA, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Coral Construction, Inc., (Coral) filed this action against the City and County of San Francisco and other individual defendants (collectively, City) challenging the constitutionality of City’s MinorityAVomen/Local Business Utilization Ordinance (the Ordinance). In essence, Coral alleges that the Ordinance’s provisions granting preferential treatment to women-and minority-owned businesses in bids for City contracts violates article I, section 31 of the California Constitution (Proposition 209). On summary judgment, City successfully challenged Coral’s standing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Blumhorst v. JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Stonehouse Homes LLC v. City of Sierra MadreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Phelps v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- CORAL CONST. INC. v. San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Alexandro Garcia v. Lemonade Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.