Legal Opinion
Tufts v. Madesco Inv. Corp.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided September 30, 1981No. 81-360C(3)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
524 F.Supp. 484 (1981)
Virginia Davis TUFTS, Plaintiff,
v.
MADESCO INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
No. 81-360C(3).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
September 30, 1981.
Richard E. Schwartz, Cortina & Schwartz, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Joseph M. Kortenhof, Kortenhof & Ely, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FILIPPINE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants Madesco and Home Insurance to dismiss the first amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.[1]
This suit arises out of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Porter v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Pretsky v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Klaudt v. FlinkMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Bandag of Springfield, Inc. v. Bandag, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jones v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Meadow Ltd. Partnership v. Heritage Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986
- Price v. Viking Press, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.