Legal Opinion

Porter v. Crawford & Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1980No. WD31205PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the trial court sustaining motions to dismiss both counts of plaintiff’s action with the collateral effect of the dismissal of the cross-claims against the third party defendant pleaded by defendants under the doctrine of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Whitehead and Kales Co., 566 S.W.2d 466 (Mo.banc 1978).

The principal issue to be resolved is whether or not the law of Missouri will permit a recovery in tort for a lawful act performed maliciously and with the intent of causing harm to a plaintiff.

The scope of review of the motions to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Andrew J. Aikens v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Martha POE, Appellant, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Overcast v. Billings Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. BoltArizona Supreme Court · 1984

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API