Legal Opinion

Bandag of Springfield, Inc. v. Bandag, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1983No. 12515PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

I

Plaintiff Bandag of Springfield, Inc„, (plaintiff) filed a five-count petition seeking recovery against defendant Bandag, Inc., (Bandag) for: a) breach of contract; b) fraud and misrepresentation, and c) injury and damage by prima facie tort. As grounds for recovery against defendants Tire Corral, Inc., and Sedalia Bandag Tire & Service, Inc., plaintiff averred: a) tor-tious interference with contract, and b) injury and damage by prima facie tort.

The cause was tried and submitted to a jury against all three defendants. Plaintiff chose to submit its case against Bandag on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Martha POE, Appellant, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. ATI, Inc. v. Ruder & Finn, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Porter v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Ruza v. RuzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Patrick D. Kelly v. Marc GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API