Anglemyer v. Blackburn
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
The appellant has assigned as errors: 1. The overruling of his demurrer to the fifth paragraph of appellee’s answer.
2. The overruling of the demurrer to the appellee’s counterclaim; numbered paragraphs 6 and 7, and in each of said rulings.
3. The overruling of appellant’s motion for a venire de novo.
*3534. The overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The appellant instituted this action to recover of appellee an alleged indebtedness of $250.00. The complaint alleges “that on the 7th day of September, 1893, the said parties made an exchange of certain real estate, situate in the counties…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Redman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Ringgenberg v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Jones v. DipertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Levi v. HareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Rout v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fry v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Perdue v. GillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Crouch v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Ray, Admx. v. Veneman, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1936