Legal Opinion

Anglemyer v. Blackburn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1896No. 2,280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The appellant has assigned as errors: 1. The overruling of his demurrer to the fifth paragraph of appellee’s answer.

2. The overruling of the demurrer to the appellee’s counterclaim; numbered paragraphs 6 and 7, and in each of said rulings.

3. The overruling of appellant’s motion for a venire de novo.

*3534. The overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The appellant instituted this action to recover of appellee an alleged indebtedness of $250.00. The complaint alleges “that on the 7th day of September, 1893, the said parties made an exchange of certain real estate, situate in the counties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Redman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Ringgenberg v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Jones v. DipertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Levi v. HareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Rout v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fry v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Perdue v. GillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Crouch v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Ray, Admx. v. Veneman, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API