Ringgenberg v. Hartman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The application for the change of venue made by the appellants was filed after the time limited by a rule of the trial court, and the question is whether the application shows an excuse for not applying for the change within the time prescribed. It is stated in general terms, in the affidavit on which the application is founded, that the cause for which the change was asked was not'known to the appellants until the evening before the affidavit was filed, but it is not shown that any diligence was used to discover the fact. On the authority of Witz v. Spencer, 51 Ind. 253, the affidavit must…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Witz v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Bement v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Moulder v. KempffIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Ogle v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Galey v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.