Legal Opinion

Fry v. Hoffman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1913No. 8,025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Henry Circuit Court; Ed Jackson, Judge. Action by Ott Hoffman and others against Marshall A. Pry and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

Appellant Marshall A. Pry, having entered into two separate contracts with the town of Newcastle for the improvement of portions of Broad Street in said town, sublet the excavating to be done under such contracts to appellees at the agreed price of twenty-five cents per cubic yard. After appellees had performed a part of the work under each contract a misunderstanding arose and the contractor refused to permit appellees to finish the work. Cer*436tain payments having been made, a dispute arose, appellees claiming a balance due and appellant Pry claiming that they were already overpaid. To secure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winans v. ThorpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. A. H. Weir & Co. v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Anglemyer v. BlackburnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Perdue v. GillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Hamilton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bereolos v. RothIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Davidson v. LemontreeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Fry v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Tyson Daishan Lamonte King v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. William A. Brock v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API