Legal Opinion

Levi v. Hare

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1894No. 1,099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The complaint in this action is in three paragraphs. The first paragraph seeks to foreclose a lien on the "get” of a certain sire for $200, under sections 2839-2843, R. S. 1894, and also to recover a personal judgment for the indebtedness growing out of the services of said sire. The second paragraph is designed to enforce a similar lien and recover a further personal judgment for the services of a different sire for the amount of $100. The third paragraph counts on an ordinary book account for $25, for feeding appellant’s mares.

Separate demurrers were addressed to the first and second…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. McLead v. ApplegateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard Dragstrem v. Richard E. Obermeyer, United States of America, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Gowdy Gas Well, Oil & Mineral Water Co. v. PattersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Farrell v. Lafayette Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Anglemyer v. BlackburnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API