Legal Opinion

State v. Carneiro

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 29, 2003No. AC 22529PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, Daniel Cameiro, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2), one count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General *427Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2) and one count of intimidating a witness in violation of General Statutes § 53a-151a (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) violated his constitutional rights to due process by failing to strike, sua sponte, the testimony of three expert witnesses of the state that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Seattle Lake Shore & Eastern Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. State v. LaracuenteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. GrenierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Glaser v. Pullman & Comley, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. John B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API