Legal Opinion

Glaser v. Pullman & Comley, LLC

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 2005No. AC 24445PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion Dupont, J.

In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiffs, Karen Glaser, KLO Associates, Inc., and Glaser Realty Associates, LLC (Glaser Realty), appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants, the law firm of Pullman & Comley, LLC (law firm), and Ronald C. Sharp, one of its members, on the plaintiffs’ complaint and in favor of the law firm on its counterclaim. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court properly precluded the testimony of one of the plaintiffs’ properly disclosed expert witnesses. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

PR…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fortin v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Farrell v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Victoria Loepp v. Ryan L. Ford Scott C. Murray and Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Ackerly and Brown, LLP v. SmithiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Russo v. Phoenix Internal Medicine Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API