State v. Laracuente
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury trial of risk of injury to a child by doing an act likely to impair her morals in violation of General Statutes § 53-211 and of sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a (a) (1) (A).2 He claims that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to order the state to specify the particular date on which the sexual assault occurred; (2) there was insufficient evidence from which the jury *517could have convicted him of doing an act likely to impair the morals of a child; and (3) the court’s instruction…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. KylesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.