Legal Opinion
State v. Ramirez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 18, 2006No. AC 25609PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendant, Armando Ramirez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 and burglary in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-102. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court improperly permitted the state to amend the short form information, (2) there was insufficient evidence to convict him of burglary in the second degree, (3) the court improperly marshaled evidence in its charge to the jury and (4) the court failed to instruct the jury on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. TanzellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. SerranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. WardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. HurdleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bryant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Twenty-Four Merrill Street Condominium Ass'n v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. SalamanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.