Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 25, 2004No. AC 23215PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, Earl Grant, appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of “age differential” sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) and two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). He also appeals from the judgments, rendered after a trial to the court, finding him guilty of violation of probation in violation of General Statutes § 53a-32. The defendant also was charged with, but found not guilty of, the following charges: forcible sexual assault in the first…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Bartell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. State v. SimmonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. State v. Victor C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API