Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Moss v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1996No. 95-1128PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant successfully obtained Gay relief from the court of appeals. That decision, however, was rendered without the benefit of State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co. (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 373, 658 N.E.2d 1055; State ex rel. DeZarn v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 461, 659 N.E.2d 1259; and State ex rel. Bryant v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 458, 659 N.E.2d 1256. Upon review, we find that those decisions dictate reversal of the judgment rendered below.

Gay relief cannot be considered without a preliminary determination that the requirements in State ex rel. Noll v. Indus.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. DeZarn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mobley v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Mobley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Nick Strimbu, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. King v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Ehlinger v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API