Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ehlinger v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1996No. 94-2171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks to compel an award of permanent total disability compensation pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. The commission seeks to have its order upheld as is. For the reasons to follow, we find in the commission’s favor.

Medically, the commission relied on the reports of Drs. Hutchison and Gnage. The latter assessed a twenty percent permanent partial impairment and opined that the allowed conditions would permit sedentary sustained remunerative employment. As such, any alleged deficiencies in Dr. Hutchison’s report are immaterial, since…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Ellis v. McGraw Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Moss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Ewart v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mobley v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Mobley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Navistar, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Bruner v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Ehlinger v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API