Legal Opinion

State ex rel. DeZarn v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1996No. 94-1232PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks to compel a permanent total disability compensation award pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. For the reasons to follow, we deny the claimant’s request and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Preliminary to any consideration of Gay relief is a finding that Noll has not been met. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 36, 641 N.E.2d 197. In this case, the commission clearly articulated its reason for the denial of permanent total disability compensation — claimant’s age, not injury, was deemed to be the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Speelman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Moss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Ehlinger v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. DeZarn v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Moss v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API