Legal Opinion
State ex rel. King v. Trimble
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1996No. 94-2150PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
For the reasons that follow, we affirm the court of appeals’ conclusion that the commission complied with State ex rel. Stephenson v. Indus. Comm. (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 167, 31 OBR 369, 509 N.E.2d 946, and State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.
Where medical evidence establishes only a claimant’s permanent partial impairment due to industrial injury, the commission must deny PTD unless the claimant’s age, work experience, education, or other relevant characteristics, commonly referred to as the Stephenson factors, foreclose sustained remunerative…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Pass v. C.S.T. Extraction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Ellis v. McGraw Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Mobley v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Mobley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Lytell v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (4-15-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Poneris v. M J Painting Co., Unpublished Decision (5-1-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Chelsea v. Industrial Comm., Unpublished Decision (6-25-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.