Franck v. J. J. Sugarman-Rudolph Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiffs commenced an action for money had and received in the sum of over $65,000. Defendants, a partnership hereafter referred to as defendant, and the partners, answered raising general issues and also counterclaimed and asserted affirmative defenses for over $98,000, and raised the defense of the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 339[1], 337[1], 338[4], 343).
The judgment from which defendant appeals awarded plaintiffs $64,054.61, with interest, and that defendant take nothing by the counterclaim. The court excluded evidence on the affirmative defenses and counterclaim on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Agar v. OrdaNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Porter v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Jess v. HerrmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.