Legal Opinion

Franck v. J. J. Sugarman-Rudolph Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1952No. L. A. 22369PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiffs commenced an action for money had and received in the sum of over $65,000. Defendants, a partnership hereafter referred to as defendant, and the partners, answered raising general issues and also counterclaimed and asserted affirmative defenses for over $98,000, and raised the defense of the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 339[1], 337[1], 338[4], 343).

The judgment from which defendant appeals awarded plaintiffs $64,054.61, with interest, and that defendant take nothing by the counterclaim. The court excluded evidence on the affirmative defenses and counterclaim on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Agar v. OrdaNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Porter v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Jess v. HerrmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API