Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Development Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1974No. S.F. No. 23029PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgment denying recovery for structural defects in apartment buildings purchased from defendants.

This case presents the issue whether the doctrine of implied warranties of quality and fitness — now applicable to the sale of goods and to some contracts for labor and material — should also apply to the sale of newly constructed real property.

In 1960 and 1961, defendants entered written agreements with a general contractor for the construction of five apartment buildings in San Jose.1 As each building was completed, defendants took possession, renting the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Naiditch v. Shaf Home Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API