Jess v. Herrmann
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Since the adoption of comparative negligence in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226, 78 A.L.R.3d 393], our court has been called upon, in a succession *134of cases, to determine the effect of the Li decision upon a number of distinct legal doctrines.1 In the instant case, we address another important issue arising in the wake of Li, namely, the proper application of “setoff” principles in comparative negligence or comparative fault cases.
In this case, plaintiff and defendant were both injured when their cars were involved in an automobile…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Van Atta v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Sorensen v. AllredCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Pieri v. Lysenko (In Re Pieri)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.