Legal Opinion

Sackett v. Spindler

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1967No. Civ. 23343PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

Plaintiff and cross-defendant, Sheldon Sackett, appeals from the judgment of the trial court determining that he take nothing on his complaint for money had and received and further awarding defendant and cross-complainant, Paul Spindler, $34,575.74 plus interest on his cross-complaint against Sackett for breach of contract. Sackett’s contentions on appeal are as follows: (1) the evidence reveals no “actionable breach” on his part; (2) damages were ineor rectly computed; (3) certain evidence was improperly excluded; (4) the trial court’s findings as to mitigation of damages by Spindler are…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Carmen P. ORTIZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Green v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API