Ferris v. Baker
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
Action to obtain the dissolution of an alleged mining partnership, an accounting, a sale of the mining property owned by the alleged partners, and the repayment to plaintiff of money contributed by him in excess of his proper share in the business of working the mine. The court below was of opinion that plaintiff failed at the trial to prove the existence of a mining partnership, and rendered judgment of nonsuit against him.
“A mining partnership exists when two or more persons who own. or acquire a mining claim for the purpose of working it and extracting the mineral therefrom…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Dow v. Gould & Curry Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1867
- City of San Francisco v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Ewing v. HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Ford v. Lou Kum ShuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.