Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1939No. L. A. No. 16221; L. A. No. 16245; L. A. No. 16246PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above numbered appeals have been taken by the named appellants, policyholders of The Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of Californa, from an order of the superior court made under section 1016 of the Insurance Code (Stats. 1935, chap. 145, p. 496), directing the insurance commissioner to wind up and liquidate the business of the insurance company. The appeals, by stipulation, have been consolidated.
*309The controversy between the commissioner and the appellants had its origin in 1936 when the commissioner, acting pursuant to the powers conferred upon him by statute, took over…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Neblett v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lake v. BonyngeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Clary v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Scrimsher v. Reliance Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Bayle-Lacoste & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.