Legal Opinion

Bonfils v. Pacific Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1958No. Civ. 5714PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *

The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Bonfils, recovered a default judgment, in the sum of $8,733.65, against Ygnacio C. Vielma, on account of injuries sustained by them in an automobile accident occurring on July 23, 1950. The judgment was entered June 30, 1953. In their complaint against Vielma, the plaintiffs alleged that he “so negligently, carelessly and recklessly drove and operated” his Buick automobile as to cause it to collide with a Chevrolet automobile being driven by Mr. Bonfils, in which Mrs. Bonfils was riding, proximately resulting in severe personal injuries to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Lamb v. Belt Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API