Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1976No. Civ. 45823PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

Appellants 1 and respondent Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Aetna) were insurers of Union Oil Company (Union) in January 1969, at the time of the Santa Barbara oil well blow-out. Aetna defended Union to the exhaustion of the $50,000 monetary limit of its policy. The instant action for equitable subrogation and declaratory relief was filed be,cause Aetna, although continuing to defend Union, believes its duty to defend ended at the exhaustion of the policy limit; that the other insurers should now take over defense of claims against Union; and that the legal fees and other…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Johansen v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. American Excess Insurance v. MGM Grand Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API