Barclay v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Court — Hon. John I. Mullins, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The plaintiffs in error were trustees for the owners, and in possession of the Windsor hotel in the city of Denver. The building was supplied with an elevator to carry passengers from one floor to another. May 9, 1896, the defendant in error, for a valuable consideration, issued and delivered to the plaintiffs, a certain policy of casualty insurance, insuring them against all liability for damages not exceeding a designated sum, “on account of fatal or nonfatal injuries sustained by any person or persons, other than the assured, in the elevator, or in the elevator well or hatchway, or while…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Anoka Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SiwyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Kentzler v. American Mutual Accident Ass'n of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Rooney v. Maryland Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Marez v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Friedland v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.