First National Bank of Los Angeles v. Maxwell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the.opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Suit to remove a cloud and quiet title to real estate. Findings and judgment were for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. Walter S. Maxwell, the husband of Amelia, their three children, all minors, and Charles A. Baskerville, as trustee, were the other defendants. The property involved was the separate property of Mrs. Maxwell.
The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: On and prior to August 23, 1893, Mr. and Mrs. Maxwell were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine thousand three hundred dollars, and plaintiff had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hager v. ShindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Judson v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McCormick v. Orient InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bobb v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Eckert v. WendelTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.