Legal Opinion

Michaelian v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1996No. F024693PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

In this case we decide that the employer’s liability portion of a workers’ compensation insurance policy does not provide coverage when the insured employer is sued for sexual harassment and related tort causes stemming from the alleged harassment. We further decide that the insurer, under no policy obligation to indemnify or defend against a pending third party action, did not become liable for defense costs when it notified the insured it would provide a defense under a full reservation of rights and subsequently, after paying only a portion of the defense costs, withdrew.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Quan v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Total Call International, Inc. v. Perless InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Ray v. Valley Forge InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Advocare International, LP v. Horizon Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API