Legal Opinion

Riess v. Sanford

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1941No. Civ. 11867PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff had a judgment against defendant Sanford restraining him from manufacturing or selling cactus phonograph needles made of and from cactus spines of the species, type and character manufactured by the plaintiff. Damages for the unlawful manufacture and sale of such needles were awarded plaintiff against this defendant in the sum of $2792. Judgment also went against the co-defendant granting similar injunctive relief and damages in the sum of $1500. This defendant did not appeal and the judgment against it has become final. The defendant Sanford has appealed on a typewritten record.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hollywood Motion Picture Equipment Co. v. FurerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
  4. California Intelligence Bureau v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Futurecraft Corp. v. Clary Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API