Legal Opinion
Futurecraft Corp. v. Clary Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1962No. Civ. 25602PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
is an unfair competition action brought by Futureeraft Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Futureeraft) for an injunction, damages and an accounting against a former employee, Roderick Koutnik (hereinafter referred to as Koutnik) and Koutnik’s new employer, Clary Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Clary), for the wrongful use and disclosure of certain valve designs claimed to be confidential to and the trade secrets of Futureeraft. Future-craft appeals from a judgment in favor of both defendants entered by the court below after a trial limited by that court to the following issue:…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.