United States v. Quintal
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARN, Judge:
The appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of larceny, housebreaking, disrespect toward an officer, and offering violence against and assaulting an officer, in violation of Articles 121, 130, 89, and 90, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 930, 889 and 890. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.
At his trial the appellant moved to dismiss the charges against him on the basis that, because he was ineligible to enlist and his recruiter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. ValadezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. WagnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. StoneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MarshU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. McDonaghU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. JohnwellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. ErnestU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. HirschU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988