Legal Opinion

United States v. Russo

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 1, 1975No. 29,573PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fletcher, Chief Judge:

Although suffering from dyslexia, a mental disorder which severely impairs an individual’s ability to read, appellant sought out an Army recruiter in order to enlist voluntarily in the service. Appellant’s uncontroverted testimony at trial indicated that, after advising the recruiter that he could not read, the recruiter provided him with "a list of numbers *512and letters to put on the [Armed Forces Qualifications] test” to assure his eligibility for enlistment. Appellant now contends that the court-martial which tried him lacked jurisdiction as a result…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. BoyettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. LeblancUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. DunksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API