Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnwell

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 16, 1981No. CM 439627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARN, Judge:

The initial session of the appellant’s trial occurred on 25 October 1979. At that session, prior to entering a plea, the appellant’s trial defense counsel stated the defense wished to raise a motion relating to jurisdiction because, he asserted, the appellant’s enlistment was made possible by recruiter misconduct and was, therefore, void. The military judge obviously recognized that resolution of that motion would be complex and time consuming. Because trial of the merits of the case by members was scheduled to begin within minutes of the raising of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. Robert L. PinkneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. SalleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. Joseph G. Hatheway, Jr. v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. CottenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. FosterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. YarboroughU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. ZeiglerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. JohnwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API