Legal Opinion

Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1969No. 20PublishedCited by 1,055 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren

This case raises the question whether a tenant of a federally assisted housing project can be evicted prior to notification of the reasons for the eviction and without an opportunity to reply to those reasons, when such a *270procedure is provided for in a Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter HUD) circular issued after eviction proceedings have been initiated.

On November 11, 1964, petitioner and her children commenced a month-to-month tenancy in McDougald Terrace, a federally assisted, low-rent housing project owned and operated by the Housing Authority of the City of Durham,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,055 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

1,050 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API