Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. McDonagh

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 27, 1981No. CM 439377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FULTON, Senior Judge:

On trial before a general court-martial for wrongfully selling cocaine twice at an American military installation in Germany, and conspiring to sell and wrongfully transferring cocaine on another occasion, McDonagh contested the court’s jurisdiction over him as a person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He asserted that his enlistment was void because it had been accomplished with the fraudulent assistance of a recruiter and that, as a result, he was not subject to in personam jurisdiction in view of the doctrine announced by the Court…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. McDonaghUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. WestU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. MarshU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. BooneU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. JohnwellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API