Legal Opinion

United States v. Ernest

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 1, 1990No. ACM 27421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

SPILLMAN, Judge:

The appellant is a retirement-eligible reserve officer who stands convicted by general court-martial, military judge alone, of five drug related offenses. He was sentenced to dismissal, confinement for five years and total forfeitures. On appeal, as he did at trial, the appellant asserts that the court-martial lacked personal jurisdiction over him. He also asserts that the adjudged sentence is inappropriately severe.

Appellant’s criminal misconduct occurred on three separate active duty training tours in early 1988: 20 and 21 January, 11 and 12 February, and 18 and 19…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ErnestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. BakerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API