Legal Opinion

Grievance Commission v. Howe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1977No. Civ. 9344PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

This is an original disciplinary proceeding in this Court involving Henry H. Howe, Jr., who was admitted to practice as a lawyer in North Dakota in July 1973. Howe practiced in Valley City until he was recently employed at Minot by L.A.N.D. (Legal Aid for North Dakota).

After a complaint was served and filed in behalf of the Grievance Commission charging violations of Canon 1 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, and specifically Disciplinary Rules DR 1-101(A) and DR 1-102(A)(4)(5)(6), the parties stipulated the facts and the answer admitted the allegations but asked…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Grievance Commission v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JoehlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API