Legal Opinion

Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & Gladstone

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 2003No. B151730PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether an attorney, who is retained by an insurance company to provide coverage advice in a lawsuit against its insured, may be held liable to the plaintiff in that lawsuit for making a fraudulent statement about coverage. We answer that question in the affirmative because deceit undermines the administration of justice.

I

Background

For purposes of our review, we must accept as true the following allegations of the complaint. (See Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 [216 Cal.Rptr. 718, 703 P.2d 58].) With that in mind, we rarely use…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Vega v. Jones, Day, Reavis & PogueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  3. Champlaie v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. Favila v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Seltzer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API